PBPF backs NLTP Act, opposes repeal, raises concerns over religious imposition and minority rights, urges stronger enforcement in Nagaland.
Share
DIMAPUR — The Pochury Baptist Pastors’ Fellowship (PBPF) has thrown its weight behind the Nagaland Liquor Total Prohibition (NLTP) Act, 1989, warning that any move to dilute or repeal it would amount to a “moral, spiritual and social failure” for the state.
In a press release issued on Wednesday, the PBPF expressed solidarity with the Nagaland Baptist Church Council (NBCC), asserting that the prohibition law remains a “workable and relevant” framework for a Christian-majority state like Nagaland.
The fellowship maintained that lifting the NLTP Act would push society “backwards” and urged the government to implement the law with “full political will” rather than in a “half-hearted” manner. It stressed that the harmful effects of alcohol are well-known and do not warrant further debate.
Highlighting the role of the Church, the PBPF stated that various support systems such as rehabilitation, counselling, and prayer centres are already in place, but underscored that addressing the root cause through strict enforcement of prohibition remains the most effective solution.
The fellowship also said it continues to pray for the government and public leaders, seeking divine guidance for decisions that promote a healthier society.
Also read: CAN breaks ranks with churches on NLTP Act, calls Nagaland policy ‘unsustainable’
Dimapur CSOs back move to repeal NLTP Act; representation to be submitted
In the same statement, the PBPF criticised what it termed as the Centre’s “infamous and illegal imposition” of the national song Vande Mataram, alleging that it infringes upon religious freedom and imposes discipline unfairly on citizens.
Calling for respect in a democratic and secular country, it stated that India’s diversity must not be undermined by “faith-based agendas” or actions that hurt religious sentiments.
The PBPF further alleged a pattern of marginalisation of the Christian community, citing concerns such as closure of Christian mission aids, restrictions on church leaders, and scheduling of official programmes on Sundays and other holy days. It also objected to the observance of Christmas Day as ‘Good Governance Day’.
Stating that an elected government must work for the welfare of all citizens without dictating beliefs, the fellowship urged authorities to uphold the spirit of “unity in diversity” and ensure that religious freedoms are respected.