India moves into the second half of 2026, the ground reality is stark. Not a single constituency in the country has been reserved for women under the Act.
Share
The kettle whistles in a small tea shop in Kohima. At a corner table, two men lean over a newspaper, discussing a figure that has dominated political conversation: 33%.
The figure refers to the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, the landmark legislation passed by Parliament in September 2023 that mandates one-third reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state legislative Assemblies. Hailed across party lines as a watershed moment for gender justice, the law was met with celebrations from Delhi to Dimapur.
Yet, as India moves into the second half of 2026, the ground reality is stark. Not a single constituency in the country has been reserved for women under the Act.
The reason, say legal experts, lies in Article 334A of the law itself. The provision ties the implementation of the quota to two prerequisites: the first Census after 2026 and a subsequent delimitation exercise based on that Census data.
Since the last Census was in 2011, and the next one is only scheduled to begin after 2026, the earliest that reserved seats can come into effect is the general election of 2034. The Act is operative, but dormant. It exists in the statute book, but cannot be enforced until the delimitation is notified.
The Centre made an attempt to break the logjam in April this year. A new Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha with a three-point formula: use 2011 Census figures, expand the Lower House from the current 543 to 850 seats, and operationalise the 33% reservation by the 2029 general election.
The proposal, however, failed to muster the required two-thirds majority in the Lok Sabha. While the government secured broad support on the principle of early implementation, regional parties from the South and Northeast, along with several Opposition MPs, flagged concerns over the methodology.
The debate quickly moved beyond gender to the delicate architecture of India’s federalism. Delimitation based on population would inevitably shift the balance of political power toward states with higher population growth, potentially at the cost of states that have successfully implemented family planning measures.
“There are genuine apprehensions that need to be addressed through dialogue,” says a senior MP from a southern state. “We are not opposed to women’s reservation. We are asking for a delimitation model that does not penalise performance.”
Other unresolved issues include the mechanism for sub-quotas for SC, ST, and OBC women within the 33%, and the system of rotation of reserved constituencies. The absence of a draft framework on these questions contributed to the Bill’s failure.
In Nagaland, the national debate has a distinct local resonance. The state currently elects one member to the Lok Sabha. Even under the proposed expansion to 850 seats, Nagaland’s representation would remain unchanged at one. Demographers point out that a state typically requires a population of 25 to 30 lakh to justify a second Lok Sabha seat. Nagaland’s population, as per the 2011 Census, is just over 19.7 lakh.
The Assembly picture is different. Delimitation could see an increase in the number of Assembly seats from the current 60. But that, too, comes with a fiscal footnote. “Increasing seats is not just a political decision,” says a Kohima-based economist. “It has a direct financial impact on the state treasury. More MLAs mean more expenditure on salaries, pensions, and establishment costs, all of which are ultimately borne by taxpayers.”
The Naga People’s Front, a key regional player, has articulated a nuanced position. The party has consistently described women’s reservation as vital to a fair and healthy democracy. At the same time, it has cautioned that Nagaland’s already limited representation in Parliament must not be diluted. “We will not allow the voice of the Nagas to be diminished or taken for granted under any circumstances,” a party statement said, calling for justice, fairness, and equitable representation.
With the April 2026 Bill failing to pass, the original timeline stands. Census after 2026, delimitation thereafter, and the first election with reserved seats in 2034.
But civil society groups and women’s organisations are now pushing for a middle path. “The law does not prohibit an early Census,” says a Dimapur-based constitutional lawyer. “If the Census is completed by 2027, delimitation can be fast-tracked and completed within 6 to 12 months. There is no legal bar on implementing the quota in the 2029 Lok Sabha election. What is needed is political will and a statutory deadline.”
The period between 2026 and 2029 is now being seen as a crucial window for negotiation. For the promise of 33% to become a reality within this decade, national and regional parties will need to arrive at a consensus on a delimitation model that balances gender justice with federal equity.
Mathew Rongmei
Dimapur