The Nagaland Liquor Total Prohibition (NLTP) Act of 1989 stands today not as a testament to successful moral governance, but as a stark monument to societal hypocrisy.
Share
The Nagaland Liquor Total Prohibition (NLTP) Act of 1989 stands today not as a testament to successful moral governance, but as a stark monument to unintended consequences, societal hypocrisy, and a tragic failure of pragmatic policy. Enacted under immense pressure from the Nagaland Baptist Church Council (NBCC) under the banner of "Nagaland for Christ," the law was born from a desire for a morally upright society. However, decades later, the evidence is overwhelming: the Act has failed in its core objective, poisoned our youth, bled our economy, and exposed deep contradictions within our society. It is time for the government of Nagaland to heed the voices of forward-thinking civil societies, led by organisations like the Naga Council Dimapur (NCD), and lift this draconian ban.
The Genesis of a Problem: Good Intentions, Flawed Strategy
There is no denying the moral authority and influence of the NBCC in Naga society. Its advocacy for prohibition, backed by chains of prayer and fasting, was a powerful force that the government of the day could not ignore. However, this advocacy was seemingly committed without a thorough study of the socio-economic consequences. The demand for total prohibition was a blanket solution applied to a complex issue—an attempt to legislate morality without considering human nature and the inevitable creation of a dangerous black market.
The Horrific Unintended Consequences: From Alcohol to Hard Drugs
The most tragic outcome of the NLTP Act has been the public health catastrophe it inadvertently triggered. By creating a vacuum in the legal market for alcohol, the Act empowered a rampant and unregulated illicit drug trade.
As alcohol became scarce and expensive on the black market, our youth turned to more dangerous and accessible alternatives. Heroin, brown sugar, and other synthetic drugs began to flow in from neighbouring Manipur and Myanmar. Deadly banned sunstances poured into the state.
The consequence has been the loss of a generation to drug abuse. Countless young Naga lives have been derailed, families have been destroyed, and our society is now grappling with a drug abuse epidemic far more sinister than the alcohol problem the NLTP Act was meant to solve.
The Question of Moral Authority and Theological Reflection
In light of this crisis, one must ask: Does the NBCC still hold the moral authority to threaten the government into maintaining a law that has caused such immense harm? A more pressing question is: Does the NBCC deploy any of its vast network of members to check and report the defaulters who run shops selling liquor in every nook and corner of our state? Their adamance seems reserved only for budging the government, not for addressing the rampant illegal trade that flourishes before our eyes.
Theologically, the insistence on forced prohibition is on shaky ground. The Bible does not advocate for the forcible imposition of abstinence. Central to the Christian faith is the God-given principle of free will. God created humans in His own likeness, endowing us with the senses to judge right from wrong, and the freedom to choose our path—even the freedom to reject Him. To forcibly remove the choice to drink alcohol is to undermine this fundamental divine gift. The church's role should be one of persuasion, education, and spiritual guidance, not of coercive political power that pricks its ego when its demand is challenged.
Furthermore, the hypocrisy is palpable. Many Naga Christians are "hypocrites" in this regard, as alcohol is openly consumed in private while public morality is vehemently enforced. This double standard erodes the very moral fabric the church seeks to protect.
The Economic Self-Harm: Funding Our Neighbours, Impoverishing Ourselves
The economic argument for repeal is overwhelming. According to 2022 expert committee reports, our state was losing approximately INR 1,200 to INR 1,500 crore annually. Another conservative estimate given by a state minister in the Assembly is INR 600 to INR 800 crore.
Therefore, even on the lower side, if we take an estimate of INR 600 crors and multiply it by the 35 years the Act has been in force, the total loss amounts to a staggering INR 21,000 crore.
This lost revenue, which we have effectively gifted to our neighbouring states, could have been transformative for Nagaland. The funds generated from excise duty could have been utilised to build world-class roads and other infrastructure, establish top-tier rehabilitation centres, and fund sports facilities, music schools, and other public services.
By maintaining the ban, we are actively choosing to fund the development of our neighbours while our own state struggles.
The Regulation and Hypocrisy Deficit
As a dry state, the government has no apparatus to regulate the quality of alcohol consumed. The liquor available on the black market is often spurious, adulterated, and harmful, leading to poisonings and health complications. A legal, regulated market would ensure quality control and safety standards.
Moreover, the enforcement of the NLTP Act is riddled with corruption and selective targeting. It is an open secret that bootlegging is run largely by non-locals in collaboration with corrupt officials and "national workers," who all receive their "cuts and shares." Yet, when a local person attempts the same trade, colony and ward authorities swiftly impose fines and expulsion. This jealousy and allergy towards our own, while turning a blind eye to outsiders, is a glaring injustice that fractures our societal unity.
Conclusion: A Call for Pragmatism and Freedom
The NLTP Act has been a catastrophic experiment. It has failed to stop consumption, fueled a deadly drug epidemic, crippled our economy, fostered corruption, and exposed our societal hypocrisies.
Civil society led by the NCD is correct to champion its repeal. This is not a call for promoting alcoholism, but a plea for pragmatism, regulation, and personal responsibility. A regulated liquor policy would allow the government to:
1. Generate crucial revenue for the public good.
2. Ensure the safety of consumables.
3. Undercut the black market and its associated drug trade.
4. Refocus law enforcement on genuine crimes.
5. Restore the God-given freedom of choice to its citizens, with the church playing its rightful role as a moral guide, not a political enforcer.
It is time to learn from our mistakes. It is time to lift the ban, confront our problems with open eyes, and choose a future of health, prosperity, and genuine responsibility for Nagaland.
Kuknalim!
L Senti Yanger
A concerned citizen