The Naga delegation signs the Oxford Declaration, reaffirming their commitment to repatriate ancestral human remains and calling for healing, decolonisation, and global Indigenous solidarity.
Published on Jun 15, 2025
By EMN
Share
The Naga delegation, comprising senior leaders of Naga tribe Hohos from Naga territories, the Forum for Naga Reconciliation (FNR), and the Recover, Restore, and Decolonise (RRaD) team, concluded a week-long series of events and activities aimed at repatriating ancestral human remains from the Pitt Rivers Museum at Oxford University on June 13.
The Naga delegation met with representatives from various British museums that held Naga belongings and human remains. Dr. Alexandra Green, curator of the British Museum, stated that a significant amount of material from Myanmar/Burma may be of importance to the Nagas, but much of the existing collection was obtained from the erstwhile province of Assam. She said that the digitisation process will be over soon, and almost all the materials will be accessible on their website. She went on to say that one Naga human remains had been taken off display.
Dr. Mark Elliot, senior curator of the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology at Cambridge University, informed the Naga delegate that only a small percentage of the material was on display; hence, his university was also trying to digitise the material for greater public accessibility. He said that there were 725 objects, mainly belonging to the Angami, Ao, Konyak, and Khiamniungan communities.
The Head of Exhibitions and Collections at Manchester University, Georgina Young, and the Lead Curator of the South Asia gallery, Nusrat Ahmed, informed the Naga delegation that they have been working tirelessly with local South Asian communities to co-create what should be included in the galleries and how they should be represented. They informed the Nagas that they possessed twelve Naga human remains, eleven of which were from the Konyak areas. The materials were donated by James P Mills, and in 1994, the Board of Manchester University decided that all the human remains were to be removed from the exhibition.
Navjot Mangat and Heba Abd El Gawad, representatives of the Horniman Museum in London, informed the Naga audience that they had stopped using the word “objects” and had begun to use “belongings” to refer to the material that was forcibly taken from communities during colonial rule. They said that they have more than 400 belongings, mainly pipes and shawls, most of which were obtained as gifts from army officers stationed in the Naga homelands during colonial times. They still have two human remains that had been taken off display. They said they would like to work with the Naga community to ensure that there could be an ethical process to repatriate human remains and belongings.
Lisa Graves, the curator of the Bristol Museum, said that they had more than 200 potential Naga collections and one trophy head that had been removed from display. A lot of their material from Myanmar had been labelled as belonging to the Chin, but it is possible that they were mislabelled.
Following these presentations, Prof. Arkotong Longkumer initiated an open public event at the Lecture Hall of the Museum of Natural History, Oxford University. Beginning with a one-minute silence for the victims of the tragic air disaster in Ahmedabad, he welcomed Kumsang Bendangtoshi, Presidential Council Member, and Tongor Luden Ao Senden to dedicate the proceedings to the ancestors and spirits. After the dedication, Dr. Laura van Broekhoven, Director of the Pitt Rivers Museum, remarked that the week-long discussions with the Naga delegation had been fruitful. This marked the culmination of five years of engagement that enabled the transition from preservation care to the cultural care of human remains and other belongings.
Dr. Visier Sanyü offered a traditional chant that alluded to the separation of the ancestors from the creator and prayed that the two could be reunited to heal the hurts of the past and present.
Thejao Vihienuo, President, Angami Public Organisation, read out The Naga Oxford Declaration on Repatriation that stated:
1. We are grateful to our ancestors for being a testament and silently proclaiming the stories of our people.
2. We are sorry that it has taken us several decades, but we are here now to reclaim and return you to the homelands from where you were taken. We are committed to the process of your return from museums.
3. We acknowledge that this Repatriation process is towards the healing and wholeness of the Naga people.
4. As Nagas, we do so in a united voice, with mutual respect and consensus and to offer you a dignified rest, establishing a Naga monument of healing and peace for all generations, symbolising the oneness of the Nagas.
5. We extend our solidarity to fellow Indigenous Peoples across the world who seek to undertake a similar journey of repatriation in the hope of bringing decolonisation, justice, and peace, not just for ourselves, but for humanity.
The declaration was signed by Thejao Vihienuo, President APO, Kumsang Bendangtoshi, Presidential Council Member, Tongor Luden Ao Senden, Talamong Khiamnuingan, Executive Chairman, Khianmuingam Tribal Council, A Peihwang Wangsa, Representative of the Konyak Union, Ngongba Tange Thamlong Phom, Vice President, Phom Peoples Council, Dr. Vihuto Asumi, President, Sumi Hoho, Jollyson Ronra Shimray, Vice President, Tangkhul Naga Long, and Dr. P Ngully on behalf of the Forum for Naga Reconciliation.
After reading out the Declaration, Vihienuo asked all Nagas present in the audience to stand in solidarity if they agreed. All the Naga representatives present, including the delegation, students, and visitors, stood in solidarity and gave their assent to the Declaration. The Declaration was then presented to Dr. Laura van Broekhoven, the Director of PRM.
Observing an increase in violence, fragmentation, and polarisation across the world, Dr. Aküm Longchari asked, “What does it mean to dream and imagine again?” He stated, “…(there is a) need for us to imagine the interplay of Humanisation, JustPeace and Healing, as the embodied aspirations of the people, as a process to address the turbulence of the world today.” He emphasised that healing for the Nagas is central, particularly when addressing the historical trauma passed down from one generation to another.
“The pathways of truth-telling, forgiveness, and redemption need to occur within the process of mutual healing to reclaim our identities, histories, and destinies”, he added. He urged Oxford University to envision an emancipatory process for humanisation where Repatriation, Healing, and Decolonisation intersect in the reclaiming of the past, present and future. In this context, he questioned whether the university could move from its colonial past and become a place for healing and justice across cultures, with the PRM as the fulcrum.
Following Longchari’s speech, Ngongba Tange Thamlong Phom invoked the ancestors in his mother tongue. His invocation highlighted the need for healing and a formal apology from the British government. He assured the ancestors that the delegations would do everything within their capacity to restore the remains to their homeland. In his invocation, he also expressed gratitude to the staff of the Pitt Rivers Museum for their sensitivity and assistance in facilitating the repatriation process.
Rev. Dr. Ellen Konyak Jamir explained the journey of the Recover, Restore, and Decolonise (RRaD) initiative concerning their involvement in the dialogue on repatriation. She informed the audience about the challenging circumstances that the team had to overcome in order to connect with grassroots and engage various stakeholders in the process. Following her presentation, Dr. Laura van Broekhoven, the Director of PRM released a book on the repatriation process, titled "Healing of the Lands: Reflections & Dialogues on the Naga Repatriation Journey." Dr. Talilula Longchar, who co-edited the book with Dr. Pangernungba Kechu gave an overall background of the book and then presented the first copy to Dr. van Broekhoven.
Following the Public Event, a closing reception was held at the Pitt Rivers Museum. Dr. Vihuto Asumi, in his closing remarks, informed the audience about the pre-colonial history of the Nagas and provided a brief chronology of Naga assertions. “We lived as free, sovereign republics before the British, and we were never colonised,” he said. Acknowledging some positive changes, such as the spread of Christianity and the introduction of education during the colonial period, he nevertheless reminded the audience of the unresolved grievances from that era. He connected the ongoing work of repatriating the ancestors to the continued struggle for dignity, justice, and healing. He also asserted that the healing of the Naga nation is an integral part of the repatriation process and will aid in uniting the Nagas.
The event concluded with Professor Dolly Kikon’s reflections on the week-long deliberations and the discussion of the way forward. Stating that she perceived the gathering as one filled with friends, mentors, and allies, Kikon said: “Through the repatriation process, we are creating a new truth and marching towards new promises of peace and a shared future.” She urged the audience to commit to the journey towards new pedagogies that centre on co-learning, co-creation, and, for a change, listening to the Indigenous people shepherding the process. “Who would have thought of a day when the descendants of ancestors strung on the walls of this museum would travel thousands of kilometres to talk about humanisation? Who would have thought of a day, since the Pitt Rivers Museum was established in 1884, that the Naga people would arrive here and reclaim their ancestors and seek joint custodianship of their cultural artefacts?” she asked.
“Colonisation was a project of division”, she said and thereafter concluded by asserting to let the Naga Repatriation process and all repatriation processes around the world to give dignity to ancestors to shine and be “a beacon of knowledge that aligns with humanity, humility, care, healing, courage, liberation, and inclusivity”.