
A file photo of traditional Morung of Chakhesang tribe (EM
Images)
- KOHIMA — In a
significant move to strengthen and streamline Nagaland’s traditional justice
delivery system, the State Government has notified the ‘Rules for
Administration of Justice and Police in Nagaland (Fifth Amendment) Act, 2025’,
introducing major structural reforms to customary courts.
- The Bill on ‘The Rules for Administration of Justice and
Police in Nagaland (Fifth Amendment) Bill, 2025’ was passed on March 7, 2025,
by the Nagaland Legislative Assembly.
- The Act received the Governor’s assent on April 12 and was
officially published in The Nagaland Gazette (Extraordinary) on April 25.
- The amendment substitutes Chapter IVA of the 1984 Rules and
outlines a comprehensive three-tier customary court system aimed at
adjudicating disputes among members of Scheduled Tribes (ST), based on tribal
laws and customs, while incorporating modern legal procedures and
accountability mechanisms.
- Three-tier customary
court system
- The new amendment establishes village courts, subordinate
district customary courts, and district customary courts.
- Each level has clearly defined powers, jurisdiction, and
procedures to ensure timely and culturally appropriate resolution of civil and
criminal cases.

A file photo of traditional Morung of Sumi tribe (EM Images)
- Village courts:
Justice at the grassroots
- Each village in Nagaland will have its own village court,
comprising members of the village council, including Gaonburas and Anghs, as
per the Nagaland Village and Tribal Councils Act, 1978. In Ao-inhabited areas,
traditional institutions such as Putu Menden are formally recognised as part of
the village court structure.
- Preferably, the village council chairman or a member is
designated as the presiding officer, and in communities with hereditary chiefs,
such as the Sümi or Konyak, the Angh or chief may serve as the presiding officer,
with a secretary selected from among the members.
- Village courts are empowered to adjudicate disputes within
village territory and among its residents when a quorum is formed.
Also read: Nagaland's separate High Court dream faces funding hurdles
- The village court is vested with the power to adjudicate
civil disputes and minor criminal offences like theft, assault, affray,
trespass, drunkenness, and public nuisance—provided they fall within the scope
of customary laws. While it can impose fines up to INR 10,000, it cannot issue
imprisonment sentences.
- In a civil case, the village court shall have the power to
impose costs as well as compensation to the aggrieved parties in line with
custom. It also has the authority to summon parties and impose fines up to INR
1,000 for non-compliance or contempt.
- SDCC: Bridging
inter-village disputes
- The second tier in the system, subordinate district
customary courts (SDCC), will be established at locations notified by the state
government. These courts are intended to handle cases between different
villages or matters that go beyond the jurisdiction of village courts.
- A presiding officer, preferably a senior ‘dobashi,’ and
either four or six members, selected on a case-to-case basis from a notified
panel maintained by the state government, will form the composition of the
subordinate district customary courts.
- They are mandated to try cases not triable by village
courts, including disputes between villages, and exercise criminal powers
similar to those of a magistrate second class under the Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
- DCC: Apex customary
authority
- Each district will have one district customary court (DCC),
which will function as the appellate authority for decisions made by the lower
customary courts.
- It will also handle original cases when needed and exercise
the powers of magistrate first class in criminal matters. A presiding officer
and two other members selected from a government-notified panel will form the
composition.
- The district customary court is vested with powers to act as
an appellate body for civil and criminal cases. While it possesses authority
equivalent to that of a magistrate first class in criminal trials, it may also
award compensation as per tribal customs.
- It can transfer cases between subordinate district courts
and is tasked with ensuring the timely delivery of justice.
- It is also responsible for ensuring fair trials and
consistent interpretations of tribal laws, with provisions to transfer cases,
conduct hearings at remote locations, and pronounce detailed judgments.
-
- Appeals, police
assistance and procedures
- The newly notified Rules for Administration of Justice and
Police in Nagaland (Fifth Amendment) Act, 2025 lays down clear timelines and
procedures for filing appeals, conducting court proceedings, and enforcing
judgments under the state's customary court system.
- Under the revised framework, criminal appeals must be filed
within 60 days, while civil appeals are to be filed within 30 days from the
date of the order. The state government has also been granted the right to
appeal against acquittals issued by subordinate or village courts within 90
days.
- While the courts continue to base judgments on tribal
customs and usages, the Act mandates that proceedings should also be guided by
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in criminal matters and the Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908 in civil matters, wherever applicable.
- Proceedings may be conducted in English or any local
language, and courts may examine witnesses under oath or caution them about
perjury.
- The Act also outlines procedures for enforcing civil
judgments. Essential household items—including houses, clothing, and cooking
utensils—cannot be attached or sold, except when they are the subject of the
dispute. Land may only be sold or transferred when local customs permit it.
- The law bars imprisonment for debt, except in cases
involving fraudulent concealment or disposal of property, in which the debtor
may be detained for up to three months.
- Courts are also empowered to seek police assistance in
executing sentences or orders, with coordination required through the
commissioner of police or superintendent of police of the district.
- The amendment further allows appellate courts to refer civil
decisions back to the original courts for execution, where necessary.