LMFN seeks government clarity on a reported directive to close non-Naga businesses, citing concerns over livelihoods, employment and economic stability
DIMAPUR — The Linguistic Minority Forum of Nagaland (LMFN) has sought clarification from the state government on the directive calling for closure of businesses owned or operated by non-Nagas, warning that uncertainty over their continued operation could affect livelihoods, employment and the wider economy.
In a press release issued on Wednesday, the forum expressed concern over a statement dated October 23, attributed to the Ministry of Information and Publicity, Federal Republic Government of Nagaland (FRGN), which announced compulsory Sunday closure of shops and the shutdwon of businesses owned or operated by non-Nagas, referred to as “non-locals.”
The LMFN urged the competent authorities to clarify the directive’s legal status, scope and implementation. It said the reported directive raised questions about the authority under which it was issued and the laws applicable to its implementation.
The forum expressed solidarity with concerns raised by the NCD, CNCCI, DMC, EDTC, the deputy commissioner of Dimapur, DUCCF, DCCI and other organisations over the proposed phased closure of businesses owned by non-Nagas.
Also read: No state directive on Sunday business shutdown — Dimapur DC
While expressing respect for the distinct identity, traditions, Christian faith and economic aspirations of the Naga people, the LMFN said the concerns of permanent non-Naga residents, particularly long-established linguistic minorities who had contributed to Nagaland’s social and economic development for generations, deserved fair consideration and protection of their legitimate interests.
The forum cautioned that uncertainty surrounding established businesses could have serious implications for employment, household incomes and the local economy. It said such warnings could create fear within the business community, disrupt market activities and adversely affect businesses, workers, consumers and citizens across the state.
The LMFN referred to Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, concerning equality before the law and the freedom to practise a profession or carry on a lawful trade or business, subject to applicable restrictions. It also noted that Articles 21 and 300A could be relevant depending on the circumstances.
Acknowledging the special constitutional framework applicable to Nagaland under Article 371A, the forum said the precise legal implications of the reported directive would depend on its nature, the authority under which it was issued, the applicable laws and the circumstances of its implementation.
It said it did not wish to prejudge any legal question without a comprehensive assessment of the facts and applicable law.
The LMFN said promoting indigenous entrepreneurship and protecting the economic interests of the Naga people were important objectives. However, it maintained that these could be pursued through constructive policies, fair opportunities and meaningful dialogue, while also considering the livelihoods and lawful business interests of long-settled residents.
The forum appealed to the chief minister, home minister, governor, chief secretary and director general of police to take appropriate measures within their respective constitutional and legal mandates to safeguard the security and well-being of non-Naga Indian citizens and long-settled residents.
It called for constructive engagement among the relevant authorities, indigenous organisations, business associations and representatives of affected communities, saying the concerns of indigenous communities and permanent non-Naga settlers could be addressed through dialogue, mutual respect and legal clarity.