Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Book Reviews  >  Current Article

Heads, Hands and Hearts: How ‘Globotics’ Will Change Worklife

By   /  February 24, 2019  /  Comments Off on Heads, Hands and Hearts: How ‘Globotics’ Will Change Worklife

    Print       Email

By Saket Suman | IANS

Book cover of “The Globotics Upheaval-Globalization, Robotics and the Future of Work”. (IANS)

Book: The Globotics Upheaval-Globalization,
Robotics and the Future of Work;
Author: Richard Baldwin;
Publisher: Orion/Hachette India;
Pages: 292; Price: Rs 699

Predictions about job crisis that the advent of robotics and artificial intelligence may unleash in developing as well as developed nations have been doing the rounds for some years now but this timely, well researched book by one of the world’s leading globalisation experts, argues that the speed and nature of this transformation may threaten our capacity to adapt to the expected changes.

Using the term “Globotics” to describe globalisation in the era of robotics, the author Richard Baldwin, maintains that it is different from automation and globalisation for two big reasons: “It is coming inhumanly fast and it will seem unbelievably unfair.”

The book focuses on describing the nature of work in the future and attempts to prepare its prospective readers for the changes. Baldin notes, and discusses at length, the many facets of working life. In doing so, he touches upon different industries — ranging from telecommunications to translations — as well as the work patterns and inherent talents of the workers.

Once the setting for the nature of work in the future is laid, Baldin, who has previously authored “The Great Convergence”, sets on to characterise the work that intelligent robots, advanced softwares and artificial intelligence technology, can do today.

He notes that there is a great deal of work that is already being done through artificial intelligence today, and points out, quite hysterically, that readers at large may even be unaware of some of the minute ways in which the nature of jobs have already undergone change in the 21st century.

Baldwin then attempts to understand, and convey to his readers, how the advancement in artificial intelligence may enable robots to perform many more tasks in the coming years.

He then compares the two: what the robots and artificial intelligence are able to do today and what they can do in the future. This comparison becomes the fulcrum around which his arguments in the book revolve.

He contends that while it may be the case so far that the blue-collar jobs were affected by the rise of robotics, but in the future it will have serious implications on the white-collar jobs too.

The author points out that over the course of the last century, people and industries across the world have understood the significance of applying their mind to things. He maintains that the working culture at large across the globe has undergone a paradigm shift, wherein workers are relying on their heads, rather than, as they would earlier, rely on their hands.

In the future, however, workers across the globe may have to depend on their hearts, more than their hands and heads because while the machines are being prepared to do almost everything that human hands and minds can achieve, they, according to Baldwin, won’t be able to perform the tasks of basic human abilities, such as compassion, face-to-face contact and creativity.

The jobs that are based on these human attributes will be safe for a few decades at least, suggest his findings in the book.

“The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics and the Future of Work” is written in simple, accessible language, is footnoted with appropriate references and explanations, wherever required, and makes for an engaging read if one is looking to understand the future of the world we live in.

The book was published in January by Orion Press in the UK, and is now available here, via Hachette India.

(Saket Suman can be contacted at saket.s@ians.in)

    Print       Email
  • Published: 6 months ago on February 24, 2019
  • By:
  • Last Modified: March 3, 2019 @ 8:08 pm
  • Filed Under: Book Reviews

You might also like...

It is just as well that the BBC has decided to expand its shortwave radio service in Kashmir to beat the communications blackout. This is not the first time the BBC has played this role – and for good reason. Because the supine, mainstream media in L.K. Advanis words crawls when it is asked to bend. Prime Minister, Narendra Modi had touched on the reasons for this spinelessness in his very first speech in Parliament in May, 2014. Although he did not mention the media, he traced the general obsequiousness to 1,200 years of “ghulami” or subjugation. Moghuls cannot be blamed for warts on the media’s face because in their period there was no media to speak of. Yes, one great editor of a paper called Urdu Akhbar, was tied to a cannon by the British and blown to smithereens for his critical writings. The Editor, Molvi Mohammad Baqar was the son of the greatest stylist in Urdu literature, Mohammad Hussain Azad. The media, as we know it today, was a gift of the British. The imperial DNA is indelibly embedded in this media, both electronic and print, which dominates the Indian mindscape. Mark Twain had put his finger on the nerve. “There are only two forces that carry light to all corners of the globe – the sun in the heavens and the Associated Press down here.” It is this western “ghulami”, which tempers our nationalism. To wear the badge of nationalism, the formula is simple: heap hatred on Pakistan and work assiduously to have your progeny parked permanently in the US. The other day The Indian Express devoted its entire front page to an advertisement about itself. The heading was: “Is Your Opinion Yours?” “Your opinion should belong to you.” The ad signs off: “The Indian Express. For the Indian Intelligent.” The ad is loaded with irony. One full inside page of the newspaper, at least three to five times a week, is a straight lift from The Economist including its main editorial. Why Xi Jinping is slipping, how Putin’s end is round the corner, why Maduro must quit Venezuela, how the Jewish museum in Berlin reflects the Muslim-Palestinian perspective and so on. This is in addition to countless other news items from French, British and American news agencies. How then do you explain the July 28, 2019 page one of the Indian Express asking a young lady, stepping out into the world, “Is your opinion yours?” It is a little impertinent of the newspaper to pose the question when its own opinions on foreign affairs are The Economist’s, and sundry western agencies. Most newspapers are guilty on that count. The Economist is a great magazine but it represents interests of the right-wing western establishment. By having this publication saturate our media space, we expose our ruling class to a point of view which is not ours, unless we have avowedly surrendered our independence to our previous masters. What the BBC is proposing now is to expand its short wave radio to beat the blackout in what is now “undisputedly” India. Here is yet another irony. The BBC has always had credibility in a state where a balanced, fearless Indian media would have gone miles to win hearts and minds. When the senior Mirwaiz Mohammad Farooq, the present Mirwaiz’s father, was assassinated in 1990, I accompanied BBC’s Satish Jacob, to cover the Mirwaiz’s funeral at the Idgah. Why did Mark Tully the Bureau Chief himself not cover the most important of stories? After all, 72 men and women were killed in the violence. Since the BBC radio was the only credible media which covered Kashmir, Tully would be mobbed because he was too well known. Satish, his deputy, would turn up with his fancy recorder but he would project himself as “German radio” which the agitated Kashmiris had no interest in. I sought protection joining the funeral as Satish’s sidekick. My appearances on Doordarshan were on issues unrelated to Kashmir. But the agitated processionists put two and two together and, not only did they identify me, they turned upon me with unspeakable fury. They had recognized me from my Doordarshan appearances. I had incurred their wrath because in a BBC radio interview I had pointed my finger of suspicion for the murder of Mirwaiz at various groups in the valley but not on Indian agencies. “You are a sarkari chamcha” they jeered at me. The mob multiplied in geometrical progression. Soon I had thousands, arms raised, about to assault me in unison. It was a frenzied, lynch mob. Just then a short man with light eyes, wearing a blue shirt and trouser, whipped out a revolver. He shouted above the din. “I shall finish him off.” Then he waved his revolver at the howling, screaming mob. “Move back.” He dragged me by the sleeves to the exit. “Now you can go, and do not be seen here.” He was Feroz from the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF). This was the Front’s signal that it was not anti-India. The story now has taken a much more blistering turn. The BBC’s credibility will grow astronomically unless strings are pulled at its head office in London with the following message: “Look, you have turned your face away from the Palestinian story under pressure of the Jewish lobby. Why can’t you turn your face away from this one? BBC will have to ponder. The Arab audience has been neutralized by Israeli stratagem, Saudi money and the western media. But is the BBC prepared to forgo the steady, reliable clientele in Pakistan? The only balm on the wounded Kashmiri psyche will be to shut up the screaming jingoist anchors controlling the multiple channels. Open the valley to a balanced, independent media. It may take time but it will work in the long run. Of course, I may be speaking out of turn because no one quite knows the depth of the brutality inflicted on the people. Only when the dark curtain of secrecy is lifted from the valley will we know whether the wounds are amenable to any kind of cure. Saeed Naqvi is a senior commentator on political and diplomatic issues. The views expressed are personal. He can be reached on saeednaqvi@hotmail.com

Read More →
%d bloggers like this: