Without an integrated strategy, drug trafficking along the Indo-Myanmar border will continue to undermine security, governance and social stability across the Northeast.
Drug trafficking along the Indo-Myanmar border has moved beyond a routine law-and-order problem. Narcotics networks, insurgency, porous frontiers and fragile local economies now intersect, requiring a coordinated security response. India’s 1,643-km border with Myanmar is porous, largely unfenced and hard to police because it runs through rugged, forested terrain. Heavy monsoon rainfall further restricts security forces trying to intercept cross-border movement by insurgents, smugglers and traffickers. Ethnicities across the border and the Free Movement Regime support legitimate travel, but they also create openings for illicit networks. Alongside heroin, methamphetamine and other synthetic drugs move through corridors in Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland. Reports also suggest that precursor chemicals are being smuggled into Myanmar for illicit synthetic-drug production.
The Tamu-Moreh crossing in Manipur remains a key entry point for drugs entering India, with subsidiary routes through Mizoram and Nagaland. In Nagaland, Mon District has been in the news due to seizures of drug consignments. The Larger consignments are usually moved by road, which remains traffickers’ preferred transport method. Traffickers conceal contraband in legitimate cargo, passenger vehicles and goods carriers, while increasingly using courier and parcel networks for distribution. Drugs also enter Nagaland through Karbi Anglong and the Imphal-Dimapur highway.
It is imperative that enforcement move beyond low-level couriers and target financial facilitators and kingpins through stronger inter-agency coordination. The Narco-Coordination Centre (NCORD), a four-tier mechanism under the Ministry of Home Affairs, coordinates with state agencies, other stakeholders and the pharmaceutical sector. NCORD should be strengthened, while state-level anti-narcotics task forces should become full-time, well-equipped and accountable. Key priorities should include vulnerability mapping, technology-enabled long-range border surveillance, cyber monitoring of online drug networks and the dark web, cryptocurrency tracking, digital forensics, drone and satellite mapping, stronger financial investigations into drug-linked money laundering, better prosecution documentation, shared databases, capacity building, upgraded forensic laboratories, and effective local and national drug-control policies backed by a strategy against national and transnational organised crime.
A hybrid surveillance system combining border fencing, foot patrol tracks, outposts, sensors and thermal-imaging devices could improve monitoring along vulnerable stretches. However, heavy rainfall and dense vegetation would make regular maintenance essential. Some state governments oppose fencing because it could disrupt social and economic ties across the frontier; designated crossing points staffed by border-guarding personnel could help address these concerns. No obstacle system is foolproof, as traffickers can use tunnels or drones, as seen in Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir, to bypass barriers. Smart fencing may not stop cross-border movement entirely, but it could improve control significantly.
Addiction can lead to job loss, financial distress and criminal activity, making drug abuse not only an individual problem but also a systemic threat to public health, productivity and security. Those struggling with addiction should be treated with compassion and supported in recovery. Society must replace stigma with empathy, punishment with rehabilitation, and indifference with collective action. Customary governance institutions such as Gaon Burrahs, Dobashis and Village Guards can serve as early-warning networks against drug trafficking. Local personnel from Territorial Army Home and Hearth units could support intelligence-sharing in border areas. While the Army and Assam Rifles are primarily deployed for border guarding and counter insurgency, they can also provide valuable information on trafficking patterns.
India must move beyond seizures and occasional border operations to address both current and emerging threats. A durable response requires stronger border management, deeper financial investigations, community-led prevention, de-addiction support and solutions to long-standing socio-political issues in bordering states that limit the operating space for insurgent groups and traffickers. Without an integrated strategy, drug trafficking will continue to undermine security, governance and social stability across the Northeast.
Col Prakash Bhatt (Retd)
(Views expressed are personal)