The Naga cause our forbearers took initiative out of necessity and urgency and the landmark symbolized of free Naga through the declaration of Naga independence on 14th of august, 1947, and the plebiscite of 1951, reaffirming the Naga political solidarity and aspiration for ownership in self determination has reached its peak as in the contemporary times. The materialization of the legacy of free Naga the forbearers of our nation originally envisioned for posterity to thrive and explore in, unfortunately hasn’t been attained and has been derailed from the trajectory of history along the way, yet the yearning orchestrating into the minds of generations following due to admiration of their intrepid resolve and fortitude exhibited for future, culminating to the present collective cognizance to alter socio-economic-political tremors and anomalies the contemporary Nagas have a collective responsibility to shoulder.
The zenith of clamoring conclusive political placement of Nagas, to achieve ownership and de-escalate from erroneous trajectory, to connect and regulate diplomatic evolution across global channels stands impervious to perverse pressure the common people could be introduced through means of auxiliary devices to ascribe and tantalize the real Naga cause that has fundamental roots of democracy and equality, and is not narrow, unoriginal and limited and averse to exploration via common cause by definition. Rest assured, the people’s common appeal transmits across common network where people of diversity with common objective intercept and empathizes without violation of human rights, as instrument of common cause and peace cannot be subjected as radical elements of tyranny and terror albeit this does not pertain for snobby campaign exhibited contiguously contradiction to equality.
While propagating peace at the expense of democratic and equal rights deficit is farcically superficial at its sum value and far from truth and rights and what’s left is for the people to discern from unorganized world view. Peace without common rights is illusionary and also the reason behind why the people in the first place assert claim of nationalistic priorities to secure itself of common natural rights to be assumed.
Common people of the world extend resource sanctions during natural disasters without any border on humanitarian terms, and governments resolute to fidelity in emancipating democracy overtly extend aid to fellow human – the contemporary world history is axiomatic, the latest being the Syrian revolution for instance. The aspiration of the Nagas to establish political paraphernalia to culture common exploration radiates across common spectrum and hope of future prospects to communicate and aid delicate community in restoring common political priorities.
The prominent dilemma engulfed betwixt is paradoxical ascertaining hording of claimant advocating be for peoples’ wellbeing and liberation conferring it of common rights and equality with freedom labeled, which devoid of is, were and could be derisory to acknowledge as oriented for common sake initially lest conspicuously may be demagogy or autocratic centered or akin to people as a subject not linear and symmetrical in the state system. People centered segregation of nationalistic claimant inclines towards the doctrine of people’s right and aspiration first before each own experiences, beforehand origin, fixated on pre-21st century maturation and understanding of political ideologies; human resources and relation etc., and exhibit naturally finesse way of adaptation and originality of approach upon consistent observation of growth and developmental indexes. The political paradox has downsized the growth potential of the people drastically economically and socially and this deficit of cultivating human resource overtime has rather cast roots for sustenance that has dependency on corruption in one form or the other.
To retrace back to stability within the gyration of existing system is a long shot if not futile. But the dilemma is further compounded when the apex has affirmation of resolving in the general interest whilst maintaining deviant in consulting the assent and rhetoric en-masse, and therein lies the disconnect. This has to be addressed in distinguishing what dialogues could be meritorious when consolidated with the ground reality of the mass as a factor of assenting in issues of general interest. The escalation of enigmas that have diverged among and has established along non-linear and non-relative trajectories has dissected the political ownership and growth of the people. Many writers have illustrated the assessment and labeling of issues, events and repercussions in compartments relating to the three score and half row of political discord and debacle in the region.
The collective onus residing along the lines of discordant perilous to resurgence and taking back in control the trajectory for times incessantly without scope and blueprint is also self-defeating in par with being disposed for imposition and hatching less people oriented diplomacies. Confronting variables that are inherent and imminent in full disclosure could definitely leverage in collective comprehension of pressing issues and would stand viable for enactment with all the dwindling enigmas because it is the people’s power drawing the last straw.
The contemporary status quo is consumption of historical contentions and factors emerged via the butterfly effect stemming from chain of events and in fact has thoroughly analyzed and imprinted with aftermath dilation vis-à-vis the present derivatives and measured with contingency projections that houses security of rights and unbiased and uncorrupt establishment of state machinery to regulate sustainable growth and development. This state presents in itself implication of contemporary scope to observe and consent appropriate measure by the people. The modern world politics is witnessing politicians take unorthodox and unconventional route to explore political feasibilities. This could also prove to be crucial when on an unconventional note embarking on an uncharted territory, a contractual module could facilitate for a sovereign contract union state and has relative conditions projected towards constituent and componential growth and sustainability as designated and oriented goals, to be regulated during adequate periods which can be well aligned and structured with minimal proximity towards controversial contingent. A more contrast upon deliberation could shed proper interpretation on such consignment of consolidation with consensus.
India is projected to be one of the largest economy in the world alongside China and US by the close of third decade and to achieve it has to be commitment and providence of infrastructure and capital to aspiring innovations of merit. To sustain this feat in a compact and voluminous populated economy the center and the states could cooperate on a systematic regulation that pivots growth alongside human resources, and the states among and with the apex inhabiting a singular unit for progression and development detaching from institutional bias and prejudices in almost possible spheres where people interact for production without personal assailment, the misdemeanor from alleged comprehension. A common approach for common interest and goal could elevate the already fast growing nation within few scores and decades to the peak of sustainability and linear with technological evolution and human advancement where boundaries has little implication over the quest for resources, common rights and preserving the depleting natural environment.
This is the century of the people and India being the largest democracy could just be the facilitator and testament of people empowerment.
