SATURDAY, JUNE 21, 2025

logo

Beat Plastic Pollution: Why the Fight isn’t Over Yet!

This year’s World Environment Day theme echoes an urgent and familiar call: ‘Ending Plastic Pollution globally.’

Published on Jun 4, 2025

By EMN

Share

logos_telegram
logos_whatsapp-icon
ant-design_message-filled
logos_facebook
  • This year’s World Environment Day theme echoes an urgent and familiar call: ‘Ending Plastic Pollution globally.’ The repetition of this theme is not a coincidence but is a desperate alarm, a reminder that we have not done enough. The Republic of Korea will host World Environment Day, 2025 with a focus on ending plastic pollution globally in a continued effort to contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). According to the Plastic Overshoot Day Report, 2024, the plastic waste generated worldwide is 220 million tons per year and as per an OECD Report, globally only 9% of plastic waste is recycled, while 19% is incinerated, 50% (end up) in the sanitary landfills and the remaining 22% disposed in uncontrolled dumpsites. India generates approximately 41 lakh TPA (tons per annum) of plastic waste and as per the 2021 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) reports, per capita plastic waste generation has almost doubled over the last five years. The statistics are alarming and it is imperative to note that waste generated data does not include the rural areas and therefore is underestimated. 13% out of the total plastic waste generated in India is recycled and as per the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) country-wise plastic data, it was revealed that India mismanages more than 80% of its plastic waste whereby it is dumped in uncontrolled dumpsites, burned or disposed into the drains from where it flows into the major water bodies.

  • In an effort to address the growing issue of plastic waste management in the country, India’s ban on identified single-use plastics came to force with effect from 1st of July, 2022 under the aegis of Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2021 aimed at curbing pollution and promotion of eco-friendly alternatives. The CPCB is mandated to monitor compliance, enforce the ban and impose penalties on violators which are to be implemented by the States through the State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs). However while progress has been made, challenges still remain.

  • The Global Stance on Plastic Pollution

  • Plastic pollution is a major transnational environmental issue, posing significant risks to ecosystem, human health and economy. Plastic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives; from marine ecosystems to the highest peak of Mount Everest, from human placenta to even the human brain tissues. Plastic pollution is considered to cause global environmental disaster that puts communities and livelihoods at risk resulting in a wide range of hidden costs for the economy.

  • Following the UNEP’s fifth Environment Assembly in March 2022, 175 UN member states adopted a resolution to develop an internationally legally binding instrument to address plastic pollution by 2024 through coordinated action on a global scale. The resolution aims to develop a global treaty addressing plastic’s full life cycle—from production to disposal. Launched in late 2022, negotiations are set to conclude by end of 2025 at the Second part of the fifth session for the Global Plastic Treaty. UNEP and the member states recognises that the rewards of fixing plastic pollution are multifaceted; cleaner oceans and lands, lessened public health hazards, greener ecosystems and stronger economies through adoption of circular economy. The UNEP reaffirms General Assembly Resolution of 2015 where the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was adopted and also the principles of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992. Prior to the aforementioned resolutions, the global consensus on addressing the issues of pollution has been highlighted, recognised and reaffirmed in multiple key global efforts which can be traced way back to the 1972 Stockholm Conference. These efforts set the stage for the ongoing Intergovernmental Negotiation Committee (INC) process which is currently in process and witnessing an impasse on several contentious issues.

  • India’s Effort in Tackling Plastic Pollution

  • India understands its responsibility in tackling the challenge of plastic pollution and has banned 19 identified single-use plastic items based on the criteria of high littering potential and low utility. In order to address the issue and phase out single-use plastics, CPCB issued a Comprehensive Action Plan on February 1, 2022 to all the State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) and the Pollution Control Committees (PCCs). In order to streamline the curb of plastic pollution, single-use plastics have been banned which ranges from items like plastic sticks used for ear buds, balloons, flags, candies, ice-cream, to plastic cutleries, wrapping or packing films used in sweet boxes, invitation cards and cigarette packets. Additionally, polystyrene (thermocol) used for decoration and plastic or PVC banners less than 100 microns were also identified.

  • As per the PWM Rules, 2016, there is a complete ban on sachets using plastic material used for storing, packing or selling gutkha, tobacco and pan masala. Following the amendment of the existing rules in 2021, the manufacture, import, stocking, distribution, sale and use of carry bags made of virgin or recycled plastic less than seventy-five microns has been banned with effect from 30th September, 2021. Currently the permissible thickness for plastic bags has increased and prohibition is applied to carry bags lesser than 120 microns with effect from December 31, 2022. India through the Plastic Waste Management (PWM) Rules, 2016 has put in place the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regime on plastic packaging.

  • Ban of SUPs in Nagaland

  • In accordance with directives from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), a ban on single-use plastics (SUPs) was implemented in Nagaland starting in 2022. The District Task Force (DTF), in collaboration with the State Pollution Control Board, undertook various measures to ensure stakeholder compliance and mitigate the environmental impacts of plastic pollution. These initiatives included awareness programs, workshops, capacity-building initiatives, and enforcement drives. However, several challenges hinder effective enforcement, including resistance from producers, shifting consumer behaviour, insufficient manpower and a shortage of trained personnel to monitor and enforce compliance.

  • Challenges remain in preventing the influx of prohibited plastic items into the state, primarily due to insufficient enforcement capacity and low public awareness. The persistent demand for banned plastics fuels their widespread availability in the market, further complicating compliance efforts for regulatory authorities. Despite the prohibition of single-use plastics being enforced with penalties of up to INR10,000 for repeat offenses, many vendors continue to use banned items, opting to pay fines rather than risk losing customers. Vendors argue that refusing to provide plastic bags leads to a decline in sales, as customers often refuse to purchase goods without them, significantly impacting their businesses.

  • Despite existing challenges, there has been a noticeable increase in the availability of alternatives to single-use plastics. Furthermore, thicker-micron plastic bags as well as certified biodegradable bio-plastics have been introduced as viable substitutes.

  • Bans Alone are Not Enough

  • The success of ban and enforcement is mixed. Through the enforcement, there has been increased awareness, promotion of innovation in production of sustainable alternatives and streamlining the EPR mechanism has led to establishment of plastic recycling plants in the country. Behavioural changes have been encouraged in various sectors whereby significant efforts have also been made by the food delivery agencies by substituting plastic carry bags to sustainable packaging alternatives like paper bags. The introduction of alternatives to single use plastics in the market clubbed with awareness generation by concerned Governmental and Non-Governmental stakeholders have been instrumental in enforcing the ban on SUPs.

  • Streamlining EPR still remains a challenge. Aligning the entire nation to EPR scheme is recognised to be a herculean task. The amount of plastic waste been generated in India is not accurately measured as there exists quite significant number of informal sectors who manages the plastic waste and in the case of data projection by the states, rural areas are not accounted. Additionally, in an overpopulated country like India, collective participation of all stakeholders comes as a challenge. Alongside monitoring, enforcement, awareness generation and control require compliance from all stakeholders.

  • About 50-60% of the waste is managed by the informal sectors which are not recognised and formalised. In fact, this sector has potential to be included in the system to aid in collection, sorting, processing, storing and trading waste materials in the recycling value chain. Formalising this sector will aid in the circular economy model and also reduce the economic burden of urban local bodies.

  • Reimagining ‘Beat Plastic Pollution’

  • The fight against plastic pollution must evolve beyond bans and penalties. While enforcement remains crucial, lasting change requires innovation, systemic shifts and inclusive participation. The theme of ‘Ending Plastic Pollution Globally’ must focus on circular economy solutions, scalable alternatives and behavioural transformation. One inspiring example comes from Kerala where ‘Clean Kerala Company’ has revolutionised plastic waste management by integrating informal waste pickers into the formal economy. The state incentivises waste collection through reverse vending machines, promoted cloth bag initiatives and establishing material recovery facilities (MRFs). By formalising the informal sector, Kerala not only improved waste management systems but also created green jobs proving that inclusivity is key to sustainability. Innovation help build the gap between policy and practice and therefore start-ups and initiatives aiding in addressing the issues of plastic pollution must be incentivizsed and recognised.

  • Strict enforcement fails without voluntary compliance and compliance remains weak without consistent enforcement. Nagaland’s struggle with vendor non-compliance due to consumers’ demand highlights this paradox. The fight against plastic pollution requires a cultural and behavioural shift where sustainability is not seen as a regulatory burden but as shared civic duty. As consumers, we wield immense power through simple acts of refusal. Rejecting plastic items marks the crucial first step in driving change. Carrying cloth bags and baskets to the market might seem like a small individual action, but when multiplied across communities, these conscious choices create a powerful collective impact. What appears as a minor personal habit transforms into a significant movement when embraced by many, proving that lasting environmental change begins with everyday decisions.
  •  
  • Rongsenben Longkumer

  • Nagaland Pollution Control Board